•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Most people wouldn't place Amazon and Nvidia in the same competitive landscape. At a glance, Amazon looks like an e-commerce investment, while Nvidia is a bet on a continued artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure build-out. However, that's only partially true. Amazon has a booming cloud computing wing with Amazon Web Services (AWS). While it has Nvidia chips to support training and inference, it also has its own custom AI chips, whose business is on fire. Amazon took several shots at Nvidia in its recent shareholder letter, showcasing the dominance of Amazon's custom AI chips over Nvidia's, so much so that some investors may be worried about Nvidia losing significant market share to Amazon. So, is Amazon now the stock to buy over Nvidia? Let's find out. Amazon's chips showcase better performance In Amazon's recent shareholder letter, it disclosed several impressive stats about Amazon's custom chips. They started by discussing its first custom chips, Graviton. Before 2018, Intel CPUs dominated the cloud computing space. However, after Amazon introduced Graviton, its custom CPU, it quickly took over by offering a 40% better price performance than Intel's chips. Amazon predicts that the AI market will go the same way. Expand Amazon's Trainium2 chip offers 30% better price performance than GPUs, and its capacity is nearly sold out. The next generation, Trainium3, which just entered work at the start of this year, has even better performance and is also nearly fully accounted for. Trainium4, which is 18 months from entering service, is also nearly sold out. Clearly, if Amazon could increase its production capacity, it could steal more market share from standard GPU-based training. However, Amazon isn't walking away from Nvidia, either. It also noted that it will continue to make Amazon the best place to run Nvidia chips. Why? Easy. Nvidia's production capacity is far greater than Amazon, so it needs to maintain a great relationship with Nvidia; otherwise, it could suffer from a lack of resources and lose clients to competitors. Another reason why Amazon must keep Nvidia's chips around is that some clients would rather use Nvidia's products. While Trainium chips may offer better price performance, that's not everything. If a single client uses Amazon's Trainium chips exclusively, Amazon can raise prices to unreasonable levels. Because the client's workload is locked into a custom chip architecture, it makes it impossible to switch, so the client must pay Amazon what they want. If they run their workloads on Nvidia's architecture, they can switch to another cloud provider's services or build their own data center using the same chip family. I'm not saying these options are cheap or easy, but customers have that freedom. Nvidia Nvidia's growth rates are still accelerating The reality is, there is so much demand for AI computing power that AI hyperscalers are willing to take whatever increased capacity that they can get their hands on, be it custom Amazon chips or Nvidia's. This trend results in accelerating growth rates for Nvidia. In Q4, its growth rate was 73%. In Q1 and Q2, Wall Street analysts estimate 79% and 85% growth. That's downright incredible and displays Nvidia's strength. I think Nvidia will be OK over the long term, and the future is likely a combination of custom chips and Nvidia's more commoditized hardware. We're already seeing this from one of the leading generative AI companies, Anthropic, which trains its model on a mix of chips, including Nvidia's, Amazon's custom chips, and Alphabet Google's custom chips. That will likely be the path many companies take, leading to multiple winners in the AI chip space. So this isn't exactly checkmate, but a sign of healthy competition.
Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…