•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
On the evening of April 16, Vietlott, Vietnam’s computerized lottery operator, confirmed that a customer won the Power 6/55 Jackpot worth more than 91.8 billion VND. The winning ticket numbers were 02-07-15-22-47-52, representing the top prize of the Power 6/55 product at 91.88 billion VND. After personal income tax, the winner is expected to receive about 82.7 billion VND.
Vietlott said it will announce the channel through which the ticket was issued after the verification process is completed. Under company policy, the regional branch handling prize issuance will receive the claim and arrange prize payment, including for tickets purchased through traditional agent channels.
In addition to the Jackpot, Vietlott awarded 19 first prizes of 40 million VND each, 979 second prizes of 500,000 VND, and 22,169 third prizes of 50,000 VND. The Jackpot 2 prize worth more than 3.4 billion VND had no winner.
Vietlott’s distribution system includes over 6,620 point-of-sale devices and more than 3 million registered betting accounts via mobile. After about nine years in operation, the company has paid out nearly USD 1 billion, equivalent to more than 2,800 billion VND annually.
Under a newly announced plan, 2026 is the first year Vietlott targets revenue surpassing 10,000 billion VND since its 2016 product launch. The target implies an average daily turnover of about 30 billion VND, nine times higher than ten years ago.
Vietlott expects the phone-based ticket channel to contribute 6,030 billion VND (over 55%). About 4,760 billion VND is expected to come from terminal-based distribution (ticket machines), with the remainder from financial revenue.
Vietlott remains a state-owned enterprise fully owned by the Ministry of Finance. The company currently operates seven lottery products using matrices, number sequences, and rapid draws.
Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…
