•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Reports citing Standard Chartered research have pointed to a long-term price target for Uniswap’s token, UNI, of $100 by 2030. However, the underlying research note is not publicly available, and the story should be treated as an analyst forecast rather than a confirmed outcome, partnership announcement, or indication of bank investment.
The reported thesis is based on the idea that assets such as tokenized Treasuries, funds, credit instruments, and equities will increasingly move onto public or permissioned blockchain networks. If that shift accelerates, value would not only accrue to issuers, but could also flow toward trading venues, routing systems, and liquidity layers that enable those assets to move.
In that framework, Uniswap is positioned as a key decentralized exchange infrastructure layer. The token’s valuation has historically been difficult to map to traditional equity-style metrics because questions remain around token economics, governance, and how protocol revenue is captured.
Even if tokenized assets grow into a much larger on-chain market, that does not automatically translate into UNI reaching $100. The higher price outcome depends on multiple variables, including protocol usage, fee structures, governance decisions, regulatory treatment, and whether token holders capture enough of the economic value generated by the system.
Despite the uncertainty, institutional price targets can influence market sentiment. UNI is a widely recognized DeFi asset, but it has often lacked the same narrative momentum as major crypto assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana. A prominent long-term target can provide a new framing for the market—viewing Uniswap less as a general crypto swap venue and more as infrastructure for tokenized finance.
The more practical takeaway for market participants is not to treat $100 as a near-term trading objective. Instead, the focus is on whether the market begins to value DeFi infrastructure differently as real-world assets move on-chain and require trading, liquidity, and price discovery mechanisms.
In this scenario, the key question is whether rising RWA activity leads to a shift in how analysts and investors interpret UNI’s role and potential economic capture from that activity.
