Get the latest crypto news, updates, and reports by subscribing to our free newsletter.
Giấy phép số 4978/GP-TTĐT do Sở Thông tin và Truyền thông Hà Nội cấp ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2019 / Giấy phép SĐ, BS GP ICP số 2107/GP-TTĐT do Sở TTTT Hà Nội cấp ngày 13/7/2022.
© 2026 Index.vn
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF has been marketed as a “dividend dream,” with some major online quote services citing a 227% yield. The fund’s own website shows a lower figure of 60%, annualizing the most recent payment. Despite the headline numbers, the strategy carries significant risks that investors should understand before buying.
The YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF uses a complex options approach designed to generate income linked to C3.ai. The fund does not actually hold shares of C3.ai. Instead, it focuses on options activity around the stock, meaning investors are not directly investing in C3.ai equity—but they are still exposed to material, stock-specific risk because the strategy is concentrated in a single underlying name.
In general, the income generated by this type of options strategy can benefit when the underlying stock is volatile. C3.ai has experienced substantial volatility: the stock is down 50% over the past year and down 70% from its 52-week high. While that volatility can support option-based income, the fund’s results for investors have not matched the appeal of the yield figures.
Over the past year, the ETF’s price has declined steadily. The dividend payment has also fallen, continuing a trend that has existed since the fund’s introduction in late 2023.
For investors who spend the dividends, the outcome would be a reduction in both capital and income over time. For those who reinvested dividends, the total return was roughly negative 75%. The article notes that leaving the money in a high-yield bank account would have been a better alternative.
The article characterizes the YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF as complicated and says its performance is not impressive. It argues that most investors may be better served by simpler ETFs with stronger performance histories, even if their yields are lower.
As potential alternatives, the article cites Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity (SCHD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). It notes that these funds have much lower yields than YieldMax, but the income may be more reliable and investors may be less likely to see principal decline over time.

Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…