•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
School-lunch programs can deliver benefits that extend well beyond education, influencing public health, labor outcomes and the structure of national food supply chains. When designed properly, they can also support domestic production and strengthen the resilience of food systems.
In Tokyo elementary schools, lunch is delivered through the Kyushoku system. At around 11:50 a.m., students receive meals prepared and portioned by staff who push meal carts into classrooms. Meals are served with limited disruption, and the process is integrated into the school day rather than treated as a separate break.
Japan’s approach is designed to ensure that what students eat is nutritionally standardized. More than 10 million children eat school lunches every day, with meals prepared that morning rather than relying on reheated cafeteria food. Dishes can include items such as fish in pear sauce, mashed potatoes and vegetable soup.
Elementary and middle school students eat lunch in their classrooms, where the program is linked to learning about nutrition, the history of cuisine and Japanese culture. Students also take turns serving meals to each other and cleaning up afterward.
As described by nutrition-education specialists Nobuko Tanaka and Miki Miyoshi, these routines help children develop “gratitude” and “a sense of respect for food and social etiquette.” In Japanese, this is tied to Shokuiku, a concept focused on education about food and nutrition.
Local governments pay workers who prepare meals, while parents pay for food, with reductions or waivers for families in need. According to Japan’s Ministry of Education, more than 99% of elementary schools and over 90% of middle schools implement school lunches.
The daily cost is typically around 250 to 450 yen per day. As of 2026, Japan plans to subsidize almost all lunch costs for elementary students—more than 5,000 yen per month per child.
In 2007, the government began recruiting teachers specialized in diet and nutrition. While these teachers are present only in a small share of elementary and middle schools, studies cited in the article report positive effects, including improved attendance and reduced food waste.
At the policy level, school lunches in Japan operate within a legal framework that includes nutrition standards, food-safety requirements and staff qualifications. The central government sets standards and supports investment in infrastructure such as kitchens and equipment, while local authorities run the program.
A key operational feature is the centralized kitchen model. Instead of dispersing resources, the system is organized to take advantage of economies of scale, reduce costs per meal and improve quality control—an approach aligned with modern food-supply chain logic, but directed toward public welfare.
The article highlights spillover effects that can accumulate over time. A nutrition program standardized from an early age helps reduce malnutrition and obesity, which can lower long-term healthcare costs in a context where health spending is rising.
Kyushoku also shapes consumer behavior. By exposing children to balanced, diverse and healthy foods, the system helps build eating habits that can persist into adulthood, potentially shifting the food market in a positive direction.
Long-term labor productivity is another channel of impact. The article links proper nutrition during development to cognitive ability and learning outcomes, arguing that a better-nourished future workforce can support higher productivity and higher-quality human capital.
Finally, the program is tied to the local economy. Prioritizing domestic or regional ingredients creates stable demand for agriculture and helps keep spending within the domestic economy, strengthening resilience across the food-supply chain.
For Vietnam, the article does not present Japan’s model as something to copy directly, but as a prompt for a new approach. It proposes standardizing school nutrition to reduce regional disparities across areas and school types.
It also calls for organizing centralized kitchens in cities to exploit scale economies and improve quality control. In addition, integrating behavioral education into meals—such as having students participate in serving and cleaning—can deliver value without high costs.
Most importantly, the article argues that how public expenditure is framed matters. When school meals are treated as an investment rather than a cost, policies may be more stable and long-term—an outcome it links to the broader importance of human capital in determining a country’s position over decades.
Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…
