Most investors need exposure to both precious metals like
gold, and to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or XRP. Each of these assets holds and gains value differently, and demands a different approach from the people who own it.
You don't have to choose only one of these three today and hold it forever. But if you're ranking them, and you have $3,000 to invest, the best option depends on what's already in your portfolio and how much risk you can stomach. Let's look at each to see why this is the case.
Gold doesn't need a single catalyst
There's a reason gold has been the fallback asset for anxious investors for thousands of years now. It's scarce, and everyone accepts that it has value. And thanks to plenty of upheaval in our world today, it's reasonable to expect gold to continue to gain in value. The price of the SPDR Gold Shares, GLD, a gold exchange-traded fund (ETF) that grants exposure to the spot price of gold, is up by 79% during the past 12 months alone (as of March 11).
During that period as well as before, central bank purchases have been a relentless tailwind, with global gold holdings now accounting for nearly 20% of official reserves. Persistent questions about the dollar's reserve currency status, not to mention global trade policy and geopolitical instability, have only reinforced demand for gold. None of these price drivers will ever require a stunning product launch or an earnings report to go better than expected.
Bitcoin is the classic crypto pick
Bitcoin, despite being called digital gold from time to time, is a far riskier investment than gold.
The thesis for buying Bitcoin is somewhat similar to gold's. It's a scarce asset which is increasingly accepted as a store of value. Many organizations, individuals, and governments are purchasing it to ensure that they have a sufficient allocation for the future, when it will only be harder to mine, and likely more expensive to buy.
XRP carries the widest range of outcomes
XRP is the wildcard here, with huge upside potential and real risks in roughly equal measure.
XRP isn't as scarce as Bitcoin, and although it might store some value, it's really intended to be used as a financial tool of sorts by financial institutions. Ripple, XRP's issuer, wants to build an entire financial services stack around XRP and its chain, the XRP Ledger (XRPL). This means a bank or currency exchange house could do everything from saving fees on money transfers to tapping liquidity and managing tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) on one platform.
Ripple is framing the coin as the lifeblood that ties its various financial products and services together by acting as a medium for settling transactions and paying transaction costs on its network, among other purposes. If big banks end up using the XRPL in the ways that Ripple envisions, they will likely end up boosting the price of the coin by way of needing to buy a lot of it.
Nonetheless, investors need to be aware that as of today, generating demand for XRP isn't immediately value-accretive to holders. Each transaction fee is very small, as are the ledger's other expenses for users. So it will take a truly colossal amount of sustained and intense financial activity on the XRPL to meaningfully boost XRP's price.
So don't buy this coin until you own safer investments like gold as well as Bitcoin, and consider that it might be more appropriate to allocate a smaller sum than $3,000 if you decide to buy it.
