Get the latest crypto news, updates, and reports by subscribing to our free newsletter.
Giấy phép số 4978/GP-TTĐT do Sở Thông tin và Truyền thông Hà Nội cấp ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2019 / Giấy phép SĐ, BS GP ICP số 2107/GP-TTĐT do Sở TTTT Hà Nội cấp ngày 13/7/2022.
© 2026 Index.vn
World Liberty Financial’s team has unveiled a sweeping governance proposal that would permanently destroy up to 4.52 billion WLFI and lock most of the remaining team and ecosystem tokens for between two and five years, in an attempt to repair tokenomics after a volatile first year of trading. The plan, published on the project’s governance forum and now circulating in the community, would apply to a pool of 6.228 billion currently locked WLFI, tightening supply just months after the Trump-affiliated project navigated a $483 million token unlock that raised concerns about long-term sell pressure. Under the proposal, the founding team commits to "permanently destroying up to 4.52 billion WLFI tokens" from its locked allocation, with on-chain burns executed over time once the measure passes and technical steps are complete. Of the remaining tokens, 90% would be subject to new vesting rules that lock them for between two and five years depending on category, while early investors’ allocations would remain fully retained under their original terms but still subject to any existing lockups. Tokenomics 'repair' after unlock overhang ========================================= In its governance post, the team describes the package as a way to "align long-term incentives and address concerns about supply overhang," framing the burn and extended vesting as textbook tokenomics repair rather than a cosmetic tweak. That language echoes community feedback and outside reporting from outlets such as CryptoSlate, which previously highlighted how concentrated unlocks and short-term allocations had weighed on sentiment even as WLFI rolled out buyback-and-burn mechanics funded by protocol revenue.

Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…