Get the latest crypto news, updates, and reports by subscribing to our free newsletter.
Giấy phép số 4978/GP-TTĐT do Sở Thông tin và Truyền thông Hà Nội cấp ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2019 / Giấy phép SĐ, BS GP ICP số 2107/GP-TTĐT do Sở TTTT Hà Nội cấp ngày 13/7/2022.
© 2026 Index.vn
Vietnam’s VN-Index edged higher as investors stayed cautious ahead of potential adjustment pressure, while trading remained choppy and liquidity softened.
At the close, VN-Index rose 8.96 points, or 0.51%, to 1,758.96 points. By contrast, HNX-Index fell 1.97 points, or 0.1%, to 251.66 points.
VN-Index traded in a range of 1,733–1,766 before finishing at 1,758.96, up nearly 9 points from the previous session. Market breadth was fairly balanced with 9 out of 18 sectors higher; real estate led gains, followed by Communications.
Foreign flows turned negative, with net selling reported on HSX, HNX and UPCOM.
Several securities firms noted that the market lacked consensus as it whipsawed within a wide band. Liquidity declined, suggesting investor sentiment remained cautious, even as the index held a constructive short-term structure.
SSI said the accumulation phase may continue, citing cautious liquidity and low diffusion.
Other commentary pointed to continued consolidation rather than a broad-based rally, with demand appearing at lower price levels. One view also highlighted that the intraday rise was supported by Vingroup, while selling pressure returned in the afternoon, narrowing gains.
VN-Index faces resistance around the MA50 near 1,770–1,785 points. BVSC cautioned that selling pressure could emerge in early sessions to test the upside gap from last week, or—under a more negative scenario—to test the MA200.
BVSC’s base case is that any decline should not be deep, with the market potentially re-establishing balance around 1,680–1,700 points.
Additional technical notes cited a short-term consolidation around 1,680 points, corresponding to the 200-day moving average, with resistance around 1,750 points. The VN30 index was also described as facing resistance around 1,950 points, with a breakout requiring further fundamental momentum.
One firm maintained a cautious near-term stance, noting the index closed below MA100 and MA50 for the day and that selling pressure around the MA100–MA50 area remained strong. It suggested monitoring support near 1,700–1,710, and indicated that a safer short-term buying point would be if the index closes above MA100 and confirms an upward move.
Liquidity was described as improving versus the prior week by +5.3% in one set of notes, with money rotating into large-cap and real estate names. Another view, however, emphasized that liquidity had declined on the day, reinforcing a cautious tone.
Sector focus for potential trading opportunities included oil & gas, fertilizers, banks and retail/consumer-related themes, cited for positive Q1 earnings.
Overall, the market trend was characterized as improving after a decline and rebound, supported by some large-cap stocks and real estate. At the same time, commentary warned that the market remains “not very attractive” and that there are limited good growth opportunities, with macro uncertainty also referenced.
Near-term expectations centered on resistance tests in the 1,770–1,800 area. One view suggested the index could stage a rebound when it tests strong support around 1,180, alongside observations that RSI is around 50 and MACD is at 0—signals consistent with consolidation and a potential retest of the 1,750 level before a possible breakout.
Firms advised investors to maintain balanced equity/cash positions and to raise trailing stops to protect profits on short-term holdings.
Trading approaches mentioned included:
Disclaimer: Market commentary from various securities houses is provided for reference and may reflect conflicts of interest.
Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…