Get the latest crypto news, updates, and reports by subscribing to our free newsletter.
Giấy phép số 4978/GP-TTĐT do Sở Thông tin và Truyền thông Hà Nội cấp ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2019 / Giấy phép SĐ, BS GP ICP số 2107/GP-TTĐT do Sở TTTT Hà Nội cấp ngày 13/7/2022.
© 2026 Index.vn
On April 10, an XRP advocate on X, Diana, shared what she described as live pilot results from Japanese banks indicating that using XRP for cross-border payments can be about 60% cheaper than SWIFT. The comparison was reportedly based on real-time data presented during the 2026 XRP Tokyo conference in Japan.
At the 2026 XRP Tokyo conference, major banks in Japan presented live results from pilot tests that directly compared XRP and SWIFT. The banks reportedly ran transactions using XRP through remittance corridors between Japan and Southeast Asia, measuring performance across multiple metrics.
According to the shared account, the pilot showed two key outcomes:
The reported settlement speed contrasts with SWIFT’s typical timeline, which can take 1 to 5 business days to complete a transaction. SWIFT payments are routed through a chain of connected banks, where each institution must verify, process, and forward the payment to the next bank before it reaches the final destination. The number of intermediaries involved can extend execution time, which can be inefficient for businesses and individuals seeking fast, low-cost international transfers.
Diana’s post outlined three reasons XRP is positioned as more cost-effective than SWIFT for cross-border transfers:
If the pilot findings are representative, the combination of lower reported costs (60% cheaper) and faster settlement (under 4 seconds) would address two major constraints often associated with international transfers: expense and processing time. The reported ODL expansion to 12 additional currency pairs would also broaden the range of corridors where XRP-based transfers could be used.

Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…