•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Shell’s Canadian acquisition of ARC is delivering what UBS said the London-listed major had been missing: additional low-cost resources outside the Middle East. In a note, UBS valued the transaction at a US$13.6 billion equity value (and around US$16.4 billion enterprise value, including assumed debt and leases), arguing the deal gives Shell access to resource depth in western Canada.
UBS maintained a “Neutral” rating on Shell and a 3,850p price target, which the bank said implies around 16% upside. UBS also pointed to market dynamics around acquisitions, noting that “equity markets rarely support the acquirer.” It cited the 25% premium Shell is paying to ARC’s last closing price as a likely factor behind early share underperformance.
UBS said the transaction should not be viewed as empire-building. The bank expects the deal to be free cash flow per share accretive from 2027 as synergies materialise. It also highlighted that ARC adds production and resource depth in the Montney shale in western Canada.
ARC currently produces around 374,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d), with about 40% of output in liquids. UBS’s US team forecasts production rising to around 457,000 boe/d by 2029. UBS said this supports Shell’s target of sustaining liquids production at around 1.4 million boe/d.
UBS estimated the transaction values ARC at 5.3 times FY27 EV/EBITDA and an 8.3% equity free cash flow yield. UBS said these metrics improve to 4.9 times and 10.2% after synergies.
Shell has flagged more than US$250 million of annual synergies within a year of completion, largely driven by drilling and completion cost efficiencies.
UBS said the acquisition adds 1.26 billion barrels of oil equivalent of 1P reserves, extending Shell’s reserve life by around 0.2 years to roughly eight years (based on UBS calculations). The bank also said it increases Shell’s commercial resource base—measured as 2P plus 2C—by 33% to around 27 billion boe.
Citi took a similar strategic view, saying Shell’s move “fits with our long-held view that the company needs to look towards M&A to rebuild resource length in its core upstream business”.

Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…