Get the latest crypto news, updates, and reports by subscribing to our free newsletter.
Giấy phép số 4978/GP-TTĐT do Sở Thông tin và Truyền thông Hà Nội cấp ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2019 / Giấy phép SĐ, BS GP ICP số 2107/GP-TTĐT do Sở TTTT Hà Nội cấp ngày 13/7/2022.
© 2026 Index.vn
Bitcoin does not need to undermine the US dollar, according to Sam Lyman of the Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI). Speaking to Cointelegraph, Lyman said demand for both Bitcoin and the dollar can strengthen each other, with investors treating Bitcoin as a store of value that complements the dollar’s role in global markets rather than replacing it.
Lyman’s view challenges the common assumption that crypto must “fight” fiat. He argued that the relationship between the two currencies is not inherently zero-sum: investors can hold both, and Bitcoin’s rise does not automatically reduce interest in the dollar.
He pointed to market behavior suggesting simultaneous demand. On March 28, Bitcoin traded around $28,500 while the US dollar index was near 102, indicating that investors were not necessarily choosing one asset over the other but diversifying holdings.
Lyman also referenced earlier market dynamics. When Bitcoin rose above $60,000 in late 2021, dollar demand did not collapse. Treasury yields remained strong and foreign exchange markets continued to function normally.
BPI said it wants to continue researching and advocating for crypto’s role within the broader financial ecosystem. Lyman’s comments align with the institute’s effort to shift the narrative around Bitcoin’s impact on fiat currencies.
On April 1, BPI published a report arguing for policies that recognize Bitcoin as a complementary asset to fiat currencies. The report is intended to influence policymakers by emphasizing that Bitcoin can coexist with the dollar without undermining stability.
No official regulatory changes have been announced yet, and BPI said it is waiting for potential policy decisions that could further affect how Bitcoin and traditional money interact.
Financial institutions are increasingly exploring blockchain and digital-currency-related initiatives. In late March, several major banks began exploring blockchain technology to enhance digital currency offerings.
Bank of America released a report on April 3 noting rising interest in digital currencies among institutional investors. The report cited Bitcoin’s market capitalization reaching approximately $550 billion this quarter.
JPMorgan Chase announced on April 2 an initiative to explore integrating cryptocurrency payments into its existing infrastructure. The bank’s chief financial officer, Jeremy Barnum, said the effort is part of a broader strategy to adapt to customer demand, adding that the bank sees cryptocurrencies as having potential to complement, rather than disrupt, traditional banking services.
Despite growing institutional adoption, economists have not reached consensus on Bitcoin’s long-term implications for fiat currencies. The lack of unified views reflects the complexity of integrating digital assets into the global monetary framework.
The Federal Reserve has not issued official statements about regulatory changes specifically targeting the relationship between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies. Sources within the institution indicated ongoing discussions about how to accommodate digital assets within the existing regulatory framework, which could influence future policy decisions affecting both Bitcoin and the US dollar.
On April 4, the International Monetary Fund released a statement acknowledging the role of digital currencies in modernizing financial systems. IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva said digital currencies pose challenges but also offer opportunities to improve financial inclusion and efficiency, while noting that specific policy measures remain under consideration.
Lyman’s comments arrive as crypto markets continue to experience volatility, while institutional adoption continues to grow.

Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…