•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Each generation has its own distinct characteristics, even when it comes to investing. Younger people, for example, show a higher tolerance for risk. More than 64% of Gen Z and 49% of millennials say they are willing to take on more of it.
That appetite naturally includes investing in cryptocurrencies, which are considered one of the riskiest asset classes in modern markets. Nearly two-thirds of Gen Z plan to invest in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin this year. The same group is also almost four times as likely to own crypto as to own a retirement account.
These figures suggest that something more structural may be happening than simple speculation. For Gen Z, crypto is becoming an important part of their portfolios, raising the question of whether that bet is mature or premature.
Crypto volatility remains one of the biggest obstacles in investing. Prices can change every millisecond, and trading happens around the clock, which can affect the final execution price.
Gen Z appears to be aware of these risks. Eighty-four percent of them acknowledged that cryptocurrencies are risky and volatile, yet continue investing. Participation continues to grow every year.
One reason is that digital assets are perceived as a way to generate extra, above-average profits, with volatility treated as an entry price. For a generation that has experienced two of the biggest economic crises in history, average capital growth in traditional investments can feel too slow or insufficient.
Digital assets also feel native to Gen Z. It is the first generation that has never known a life without the internet, and many are already accustomed to digital wallets and online transactions. Their investment behavior is also shaped by social media consumption: one in four American Gen Z gets financial advice from TikTok. With “finfluencers” widespread online, the level of crypto interest among Zoomers is not surprising.
Beyond risk tolerance, another factor distinguishes Gen Z from previous generations: fear of missing out (FOMO). This anxiety—often tied to the fear of lost profits—can be intensified by comparing lives with the idealized portrayals seen on social networks.
FOMO is especially common among Zoomers when it comes to financial matters. Nearly 70% of Gen Z says they feel financial FOMO while scrolling social media. Among Gen Z crypto investors, 50% said they have made an investment driven by this feeling, most often in crypto, particularly memecoins.
Memecoins thrive in this environment because they are designed for virality and media coverage. The issue is not only that they are built on hype, but that they are often made to capture a moment and then fade. Each memecoin cycle—rising quickly and then falling—reinforces the argument that digital assets are unsafe.
This creates a narrative duality. On one side, crypto is maturing and institutional flows are increasing. On the other, the industry remains heavily influenced by FOMO, which dominates headlines and can shift attention toward speculative gains.
As Gen Z increases its crypto exposure, some may do so without fully researching the risks. The article notes that some Zoomers may trust TikTok advice without conducting due diligence or consulting a financial advisor.
Confidence is also high. More than 70% of Gen Z say they are completely sure about their investing behavior. However, confidence—especially in crypto—does not necessarily indicate competence. The article says younger generations may be more susceptible to the Dunning-Kruger effect, which can lead people to overestimate their knowledge and underestimate risks.
Beyond volatility, the article highlights another concern: the lack of transparency in crypto. Unlike public companies, digital assets have no reporting requirements. The article describes this “Wild West” environment and limited long-range regulation as not bothering young crypto enthusiasts, who still trust crypto. It argues that greater attention to regulation could help protect investor rights and make the market more transparent and trustworthy.
It also cautions that diversification is not simply about allocating 10% to 20% of a portfolio to crypto. Correlation matters. During periods of systemic stress, crypto has at times moved in line with high-growth equities, weakening its diversification value. The article also notes that Bitcoin can correlate with gold, a traditional safe-haven asset.
Finally, it warns that choosing the wrong coin can be costly. Without understanding how digital assets work, investors may risk losing a fourth of their investments if they allocate at least 25% to a single asset.
Despite these risks, the article states that none of them necessarily devalues crypto’s role in modern portfolios. It suggests crypto might be evolving into a genuine portfolio diversifier.
If that transformation is real, the article argues it comes with “strings attached,” including the need to better understand volatility, transparency, regulation, and correlation dynamics.
This opinion article presents the author’s expert view, and it may not reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. This content has undergone editorial review to ensure clarity and relevance. Cointelegraph remains committed to transparent reporting and upholding the highest standards of journalism. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before taking any actions related to the company.
Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…
