Get the latest crypto news, updates, and reports by subscribing to our free newsletter.
Giấy phép số 4978/GP-TTĐT do Sở Thông tin và Truyền thông Hà Nội cấp ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2019 / Giấy phép SĐ, BS GP ICP số 2107/GP-TTĐT do Sở TTTT Hà Nội cấp ngày 13/7/2022.
© 2026 Index.vn
Debate around crypto’s Real-World Assets (RWA) segment has frequently focused on Ripple and XRP. However, an overview of the broader RWA market by blockchain shows that Ripple’s XRP Ledger is not leading on key metrics.
Data from RWA.xyz, which tracks the RWA market and blockchain performance, indicates that Ethereum leads the sector by total distributed RWA value. On this measure, the XRP Ledger is not among the top five.
The top five RWA chains by distributed value are Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana, Stellar, and Liquid Network, with distributed values of $15.54 billion, $3.5 billion, $1.949 billion, $1.41 billion, and $1.32 billion, respectively.
The XRP Ledger ranks 8th with $458.46 million in distributed RWA value, placing it behind Arbitrum and Avalanche.
RWA.xyz data also shows the XRP Ledger underperforms on user count. The network ranks 10th with fewer than 5,000 users.
By comparison, Plume has 259,000 users, Solana has 184,000, and Ethereum has 164,000—these three chains lead the user base in the RWA segment.
While the XRP Ledger ranks lower on distributed value and user count, it performs better on represented value on-chain. In this metric, ZKsync Era leads with $2.2 billion, while the XRP Ledger follows with $1.5 billion.
This places the XRP Ledger ahead of Ethereum, Solana, and Plume in represented value, suggesting ongoing participation on the blockchain despite weaker rankings in other measures.
The RWA sector appears to be expanding quickly. RWA.xyz reports that total Distributed Asset Value across blockchains has reached $27.68 billion.
In addition, the site shows more than 710,000 holders and $441.38 billion in Represented Asset Value.
Premium gym chains are entering a “golden era” that is ending or already in decline, as rising operating costs collide with shifting consumer preferences toward more flexible, community-based ways to exercise. Long-term memberships are shrinking, margins are pressured by higher rents and facility expenses, and competition from smaller, more personalized…